I ended up putting an asterisk after the email address, which got it to
go.
ADD testlist2 DD=job1 IMPORT
//job1 DD *
[log in to unmask] *
[log in to unmask] *
/*
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick B. O'Brien
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 7:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: FW: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D)
Got it to go! Thanks!
> ADD testlist2 DD=job1 IMPORT
ADD: no error, 2 recipients added, no entry changed, no duplicate, none
forwarded.
Summary of resource utilization
-------------------------------
CPU time: 0.002 sec Device I/O: 0
Overhead CPU: 0.002 sec Paging I/O: 0
CPU model: 450MHz Pentium III (502M)
Job origin: [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Bronna Bodenstein [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 7:53 AM
To: Patrick B. O'Brien
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: FW: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D)
I don't see anything obviously wrong with your syntax.
I'm going to try adding you to one of my test lists and
see if I can recreate the error.
Bronna Bodenstein
L-Soft Customer Support
Subject: RE: FW: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D)
Date sent: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:25:51 -0800
From: "Patrick B. O'Brien" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
I'm here, this is the email and the results, any thought?
Thanks,
ADD testlist2 DD=job1 IMPORT
//job1 DD *
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
/*
> ADD testlist2 DD=job1 IMPORT
DDname "JOB1" not found in job stream.
> job1 DD *
Unknown command - "JOB1". Try HELP.
> [log in to unmask]
Unknown command - "[log in to unmask]". Try HELP.
> [log in to unmask]
Unknown command - "[log in to unmask]". Try HELP.
> /*
Unknown command - "/*". Try HELP.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Shannon [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 4:20 PM
To: L-SUPPORT; Patrick B. O'Brien
Subject: Re: FW: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D)
Patrick
you've obviously gone home already (which is a Good Thing on a holiday
:) so I've made an attempt to answer your quesiton on LSTSRV-L. I
figured it was worth answering there as it may benefit other LISTSERV
users as well.
--
Michael Shannon
L-Soft Technical Support
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 02/01/2004 at 10:42 AM Michael Shannon wrote:
>Oops..I just saw your post to LSTSRV-L....
>
>Can you send us a copy of the original bulk ADD job you sent to
>LISTSERV? I'd like to see how it was constructed.
>
>--
> Michael Shannon
> L-Soft Technical Support
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 01/01/2004 at 11:55 AM Patrick B. O'Brien wrote:
>
>>Hello Jacob,
>>
>>I know you're off today.
>>
>>Just to show you that a lot of stuff is working on Cascade. Still
>>can not get to Bulk Operations for a List, is there another way to
>>add users?
>>
>>Should I wipe everything out and do a reinstall?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>1 Jan 2004 11:44:13 Processing file 0002 from
[log in to unmask]
>>1 Jan 2004 11:44:13 From [log in to unmask]: QUIET SET ealerts
>>NOPOST
FOR
>>*@*
>>1 Jan 2004 11:44:13 Requesting confirmation, cookie=906F4A9D
>>1 Jan 2004 11:44:13 Sent information mail to [log in to unmask] 1
>>Jan 2004 11:44:34 From [ANONYMOUS]@CASCADE.STATE.NV.US: OK 906F4A9D
>>1 Jan 2004 11:44:34 From [log in to unmask]: QUIET SET ealerts
>>NOPOST
FOR
>>*@*
>>1 Jan 2004 11:44:35 To [ANONYMOUS]@CASCADE.STATE.NV.US: One entry
>>updated. No notification has been sent. 1 Jan 2004 11:46:54 From
>>[ANONYMOUS]@CASCADE.STATE.NV.US: OK 906F4A9D 1 Jan 2004 11:46:54 To
>> [ANONYMOUS]@CASCADE.STATE.NV.US: The
confirmation
>>code 906F4A9D does not correspond to any pending command. A (...)
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: L-Soft list server at CASCADE.STATE.NV.US (1.8e)
>>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 11:44 AM
>>To: Patrick B. O'Brien
>>Subject: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D)
>>
>>Your command:
>>QUIET SET ealerts NOPOST FOR *@*
>>has been received. For security reasons, you are now required to
>>reply to this message, as explained below, to confirm the
>>execution of your command. Note that the security level of the
>>list is under list owner control, and that is the person you
>>should contact if you have any complaint about security
>>procedures. To confirm the execution of your command, simply point
>>your browser to the following URL:
>>http://cascade.state.nv.us/cgi-bin/wa?OK=906F4A9D&L=EALERTS
>>Alternatively, if you have no WWW access, you can reply to the
>>present message and type "ok" (without the quotes) as the text of
>>your message. Just the word "ok" - do not retype the command. This
>>procedure will work with any mail program that fully conforms to
>>the Internet standards for electronic mail. If you receive an
>>error message, try sending a new message to
>>[log in to unmask] (without using the "reply"
>>function - this is very important) and type "ok 906F4A9D" as the
>>text of your message. Finally, your command will be cancelled
>>automatically if LISTSERV does not receive your confirmation within
>>48h. After that time, you must start over and resend the command to
>>get a new confirmation code. If you change your mind and decide that
>>you do NOT want to confirm the command, simply discard the present
>>message and let the request expire on its own.
>>------------------------- Original mail header
>>-------------------------- X-LSVMFlags: 16 Received: from
>>EXCH.state.nv.us ([10.131.11.135]) by cascade.state.nv.us
>>(8.12.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i01JiCP6022624 for
>><[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:44:12 -0800
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 MIME-Version:
>>1.0 Subject: Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:43:35 -0800 Message-ID:
>><[log in to unmask]>
>>X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: thread-index:
>>AcPQn9/jZip8yDxFEdiLIgCQJwd5fw== From: "Patrick B. O'Brien"
>><[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]>
|
