 
|
| Sender: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
Harold C Pritchett <HAROLD@UGA> |
| Date: |
Mon, 6 Jun 88 11:36:25 EDT |
| In-Reply-To: |
Message of Mon, 6 Jun 88 10:18:23 EDT from <GERLAND@UBVM> |
| Reply-To: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
>>While I know it's one more exception, but would it be worthwhile for the
>>Command interpretor of Listserv throwing away jobs that have a > in col 1?
>>Loops such as the one here on IBM7171 might be reduced. I don't know what
>
>Harry, wouldn't that elimiante doing 'reply text' like this?
>
>Jim...
No, it would only preclude sending REPLY TEXTs to LISTSERV as command files.
It appears that the bug was that a file got left in LISTSERV's reader and
was processed as a command file, not a mail file to the list....
Harold
|
|
|
