Isn't rich text sent MIME encoded as an attachment? I thought it was.
If so, then wouldn't this (Attachments= No) be stripping it out?
Try 'Attachments= Yes' and see what happens. I wish I knew for sure, all
I know is that everyone I ever asked that question to ("Just exactly how
does rich text get sent?") didn't have a definitive answer either.
-Jim
--
Jim Serwinowski [log in to unmask]
UB Listserv Administrator http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Teresa Moore wrote:
> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:00:52 -0400
> From: Teresa Moore <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Outlook/Rich Text Format
>
> Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately, I still don't get this. ;-)
>
> If I send a rich text message from Outlook 2000 to the list, and view the distributed posting in the same Outlook 2000 client, it comes through as plain text. If I send a rich text formatted message from Outlook 2000 to my own account--(that I view within the same Outlook 2000 client)--it comes through with formatting displayed. (The latter scenario does not involve LISTSERV, because the message is not sent to the list. Under Properties of this formatted message, "Type: Message (Rich Text)" displays).
>
> Here's the list header:
>
> Confidential= Yes
> Language=HTML
> Owner= [log in to unmask] (XXX)
> Owner= quiet:
> Owner= [log in to unmask] (XXXX)
> Review= Owner Only
> Subscription= Closed
> Notify= No
> Send= [log in to unmask]
> Auto-delete= No
> Notebook= No
> Reply-to= Sender,Respect
> Ack= No
> Errors-To= Owner
> Validate= Yes, Confirm
> X-tags= No
> Default-Options= Repro, Full, Mime
> Attachments= No
>
> Any ideas on this one? Thanks in advance,
> Teresa
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Teresa Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [LSTSRV-L] Outlook/Rich Text Format
>
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> Language=HTML is in the header.
>
> Thanks,
> Teresa
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Weiss" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [LSTSRV-L] Outlook/Rich Text Format
>
>
> Check to see if the list has a definition header of:
>
> LANGUAGE= NOHTML
>
> If so, remove that (until the posting has been distributed)
>
> /pete
>
> At 12:56 07/31/2002 Wednesday, Teresa Moore wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I apologize if this topic was already discussed in the past. I did some
> >searching and looked through the documentation, but can't find the
> >information I am looking for. Unfortunately, we are in a crunch for time
> >on this one, because the poster wants to send out his mailing soon. (We
> >are using LISTSERV 1.8d)
> >
> >The subscriber wants to post a message to his list with Outlook 2000
> >(configured to address an Exchange server). He wants to send the posting
> >in Outlook's Rich Text format. Last time he posted to this list, it came
> >through as plain text. I sent a rich text message from Outlook to a test
> >list, that mimics his list, and it also came through in plain text. How
> >do I get his list to interpret the Rich Text formatted message sent by
> >Outlook, in order for the posting to be distributed with its intended
> >formatting?
> >
> >Thank you,
> >Teresa Moore
> >
> >Senior Programmer/Analyst
> >University at Albany
> >State University of New York
> >(518) 437-3780
> End Reply
>
>
>
|