|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 13:07:00 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
In-Reply-To: |
<v04210102b3fd68d23f4f@[206.133.176.94]> |
Organization: |
Queen's University |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Jacob Haller wrote:
> If you want to hold onto your beer money after those revelations I
> think it's understandable. ;-)
It was indeed a bad example to use to make a point. The point was that
sometimes lists are not used for voluntary discussions where the List
Owner should have total access to the subscribership. Currently, we get
around it with a Super List owned by a faulty member who is editor, with
students subscribed to a sub-list that said faculty member does not own
and use REVIEW= Owner. A programmed mail server that feeds the sub-list
owns the sub-list "quietly". This is probably more complicated than it
has to be, but it works with our privacy policies. Well, one day a lady
will walk into the Lsoft offices and shout, "Who wants to go for a beer?".
That would be me.
--Trish, Queen's University
|
|
|