LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (35 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:55:58 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject:
From:
"Plowinske, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
quoted-printable
Comments:
on Thursday, March 15, 2012 11:11 AM, Pete Weiss wrote:

> The first question that comes to my mind, is HOW MANY folks are
concerned about the super list's
> (distributions) lack of DIGEST?

Actually everyone on the sub-lists get EVERY e-mail sent to the
Super-list as MAIL and not DIGEST.  Sending a Super-list e-mail
basically defeats the purpose of DIGESTS on the sub-lists.

> If only a few are that concerned, that simply add them to the
super-list since I do not think
> L-Soft would re-engineer this mechanism.

I know I can add them to the Super-List but that doesn't seem very
efficient. Now they have 2 places to maintain their list options and the
list owner now has the extra maintenance for the Super-list.

> Modern dahy mail systems have methods of filtering ... to a label or
folder.  Have customer create
> such a construct and have them check it once per day.

I'm aware that there are other methods of filtering via e-mail clients
but having the subscribers use the Digest feature doesn't seem
unreasonable.

Thanks, Mike

############################

To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2