LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (21 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
"Forum on LISTSERV release 1.6" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Zvika Bar-Deroma <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Apr 1991 10:01:36 IST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Tue, 2 Apr 91 16:29:12 EST from <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
Warning -- original Sender: tag was [log in to unmask] To: Network Information Discussion <[log in to unmask]> Resent-From: Zvika Bar-Deroma <AER7101@TECHNION> Originally-From: Murph Sewall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
LSTSRV-L@SEARN
The following is an extract from a message posted on INfO-NETS. Could
anyone explain to me how this happends ? Is there a point in sending to
a nearest backbone server through the destination node ?
/Zvika
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
(most of the message deleted )
 
 
Generally, but NOT always if there's a closer LISTSERV downstream, the
delivering LISTSERV (the node just before your own system's mailer header),
is as close as any.  I subscribe to one list which originates on YaleVM
(one hop away) which sends my list mail to Marist (also one hop away)
THROUGH my host and then Marist sends it to me (?!!).  The DISTribute
table may not be optimized for that one :-) Marist IS a backbone (probably
accounts for the behavior).
 
 
/s Murph <[log in to unmask]>    BITNET/Internet
         ...!uunet!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall                UUCP
 + Standard disclaimer applies ("The opinions expressed are my own" etc.)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2