>
>I would like someone to actually convince  me that this list is worth spending
>25% of our bandwidth, not to mention the LISTSERV/MAILER CPU time, etc etc. No
>other list in  the world produces anything above 20%  of the INFO-VAX traffic,
>and these are already  what we call "huge" lists. That's a  bit as if INFO-VAX
>mapped into the yearly benefits of IBM, LINKFAIL were those of DEC, etc.
>
>  Eric
 
May be, there are many VAXen in the world and all of there users need a
lot of information to drive them.
 
Wolfram   WOFA@DB0FUB11
         MAINT@DB0FUB11
        EARNIE@DB0FUB11 (today)