I noticed lots of these in the LISTSERV queue when I realized LISTSERV
seemed rather slow.  I SERVEd the address OFF and suggest everyone do
the same and be on the lookout for this garbage -- it's a potentially
serious issue!

Bill

>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from CUNYVM (NJE origin SMTP5@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LMail
>          V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 6821; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 03:22:44 -0500
>Received: from listserv.cuny.edu  128.228.100.10  by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM
> SMTP V2R4a) via TCP with SMTP ; Tue, 01 Dec 1998 03:22:42 EST
>Received: from minerva.ibernet.es (minerva.ttd.net) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP
>
> for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 1 Dec
> 1998 3:25:40 -0500
>Received: from iname.com (p2h204.anit.es  195.76.122.204 )
>        by minerva.ibernet.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA16592;
>        Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:18:38 +0100 (MET)
>Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:18:38 +0100 (MET)
>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>From: <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>help
>info
>help
>info
�repeated for 5499 lines!�