 
|
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 14 Jul 1993 18:07:08 -0400 |
| In-Reply-To: |
Your message of 13 Jul 1993 13:38:03 GMT |
| Comments: |
<Parser> W: TO field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained.
<Parser> W: TO field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained.
<Parser> W: TO field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained.
<Parser> W: TO field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained. |
| Reply-To: |
|
On 13 Jul 1993 13:38:03 GMT Chris Barnes said:
>On Mon, 12 Jul 1993 16:44:49 -0400 F. Scott Ophof said:
>> Listname: Name of List <listaddr@...>
>I totally agree with the intent, but not the implementation. *I*
>think merely refining what the Sender: and From: tags indicate would
>do it. IMHO, the Sender: tag should have the list address (if present);
>the From: tag should ALWAYS point to the real person that initiated the
>mail message.
I think you will discover in RFC 822 that "Sender:" is not the
formally correct header for this purpose. Agreed re "From:".
I've been playing around with combinations of headers (as many
others must have already) but literal & figurative headaches were
the only result.
>BTW: does anyone know of an ftp site for rfc822? I think it's high time
>I actually sat down and read the thing.....
Site: wuarchive.wustl.edu
Directory: doc/rfc/
File: rfc822.txt.Z (case-sensitive)
Regards.
$$\
|
|
|
