Based on the message below, is the sender being treated as [log in to unmask] com
?

------------------------ Rejected message (792 lines)
-------------------------
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from mail.xxx.com (146.145.213.67:4350) by
listserve.hubbardhost.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:55:47 -0500
Received: from abc.xxx.com ([10.14.1.122]) by mail.xxx.com with SMTP
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
        id MRGK0F2R; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:34:07 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:51:08 -0700
To: [log in to unmask]
From: alerts <[log in to unmask]>

Christopher A. Ferraro
Senior Systems Engineer, Hubbard One
p: 312.939.5000 x 269
f: 312.939.6000
m: 312.286.8466
m2: 312.420.6678



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Russell [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Rejected posting from editor on announce-only list


In one of his messages in this thread, Ben Parker suggested that you check
the headers on the message that is being sent to the list to see if there is
a "Sender:" header. Have you done this? If there is a "Sender:" header
present in a message processed by LISTSERV, that header will be given
precedence over the "From:" header.

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 Christopher Ferraro <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Whoops, I sent the wrong note previously.  I meant implemented the
>fixes below suggested by Ben.  Does anyone have any other ideas ?

--
Paul Russell
Senior System Administrator
O&E Messaging Services Team
University of Notre Dame