|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Apr 1998 10:27:02 EDT |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
L-Soft international, Inc. |
Reply-To: |
|
On Tue, 21 Apr 1998 09:53:18 -0400 you said:
>So, can a precedence header line be configured for listserv (1.8c) or is
>it already configured or what?
No and no...and I might add that just because the bat book says it should
be so doesn't make it a good reference. To my knowledge no current standard
requires such lines (nothing in RFC821, RFC822, or RFC1123 in any case).
The bat book is simply trying to make a case for something the sendmail
author has decided is a Good Thing (the "well-designed program" mentioned
specifically in the bat book is vacation(1), which the sendmail author also
wrote). The bottom line is that it is not difficult to determine that a
message is coming from a mailing list and that it should not be responded
to by a vacation daemon. We've discussed this before on this list...
Nathan
|
|
|