|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:23:08 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
Your message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:02:00 EDT."
<3AD42B98.18146.3B2CD7E@localhost> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Comments: |
|
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:02:00 EDT, "Wayne T. Smith" <[log in to unmask]> said:
> Perhaps I'm unintentionally neglecting some of my duties. I've *never*
> found one of these useful. What procedure does LSoft suggest I take
> with them?
Personally, most of them don't do anything for me either. I use
procmail to filter all of them into their own notebook, and once a day
I zip through and hit the 'delete' button on all the ones that were
caused by other users at other sites. If it's caused by one of our
users, I forward the note to the appropriate people and let them beat
the offender up with the rubber hoses. ;)
Now, what would cut down *my* workload enough is if MicroSnot Exchange
and Dan Bernstein's QMail would get on the ball and start supporting
RFC1891-RFC1894 format bounce messages so when stuff bounces, the
Listserv bounce parser can actually DO something with it other than
drop it in my mailbox.... ;)
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
|
|
|