At 02:17 PM 2/25/97 EST, Peter M. Weiss +1 814 863 1843 wrote:
>Are you absolutely sure that this isn't a sendmail-type of
>hop counting vs. LISTSERV(R)?
Huh? A hop is a hop. One Received: header == one hop, for purposes
of generating this error, as far as I can tell. Maybe you meant
something else, and my thick skull just won't absorb it today... :-)
>BTW, if you haven't, try SET listname SHORT -- this might
>bypass the particular situation with LISTSERV backbone/peered
>lists.
I tried that just for fun. Is this list (LSTSRV-L) peered BTW?
First of all, your suggestion "works" -- Received: headers, before
leaving uga.cc.uga.edu, are no longer present. This will do just
fine for most users, I imagine.
However, Message-Id: is stripped. I don't like that. Besides,
both Message-Id: and Received: headers have their uses (tracing
spam, identifying trouble spots, etc.), and I really would prefer
to have them. (I haven't looked in great detail to see what
else might be different.)
I think the "solution" may be to get the sendmail default raised from
17, a number which once probably made sense but now probably does
not -- but unfortunately this is probably a slow process.
<sigh> I'm tired tonight...uninspired...maybe another time.
Cheers,
Stan
|