Just setting the Loopcheck= Spam-Delay() parameter doesn't change the default "full" loop-checking.  I thought that was documented but perhaps it isn't.

Nathan

From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matthew Black
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 11:47 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: LOOPCHECK [was: Processing delay for non-subscribers]

A helpful user wrote me off-list about using
Loopcheck= Spam-Delay(0)

Can anyone offer experience/advice on whether I should use (0) or (1)? LISTSERV manuals recommend against changing the default setting Loopcheck= Full.

Does the FILTER keyword take precedence over the spam checks of LOOPCHECK?

matthew black
california state university, long beach

From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matthew Black
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 7:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Processing delay for non-subscribers

LISTSERV appears to delay processing messages to public lists from non-subscribers:

30 Oct 2013 07:50:30 Processing file 0248 from MAILER@servername
30 Oct 2013 07:50:30 -> Inserting top/bottom banners...
-> Not a subscriber, will process in 10 minutes.


How can we disable that delay?

matthew black
california state university, long beach

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1