Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Maximum length of the 'Send=' keyword
From:
Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Forum on LISTSERV release 1.6
Date:
Thu, 25 Oct 1990 21:39:18 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>1) What is the  most efficient method of assigning a  long string to the
>   'Send=' keyword in a list header?  I have been using multiple 'Send='
>   statements.
 
That is the only way to do it.  Code as many statements as you need, they
will all be concatenated together. No problem.
 
>    I attempted to define a variable in the LOCAL SYSVARS file, such as:
 
These  variables are  an entirely  different thing,  think about  them in
terms of system configuration parameters.  List header definitions do not
refer to these parameters.
 
>2) If the CACHE file has 1 entry per keyword, am I correct in estimating
>   that the  maximun length  of the 'Send='  keyword parameter  would be
>   constrained by the 256 LRECL of the CACHE file, or can the CACHE file
>   contain multiple keyword entries?
 
This  is a  RECFM V  file, so  the LRECL  is merely  that of  the longest
record. The limit is 64k per keyword (255 before 1.6e).
 
  Eric

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV