LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (31 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:59:12 -0500
Reply-To:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
Paul Russell <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In-Reply-To:
<000301cabbc6$5bdab8e0$13902aa0$@edu>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
On 3/4/2010 13:13, Steve Eckard wrote:
> Here I go again. Hope these questions don't seem to silly, but I ask because
> I don't know. I have a user who is subscribed to a list which does not have
> the digest keyword defined in the configuration. However, it seems she is
> getting a number of messages at one time indicating the digestification. I
> guess I do not know what the following means in that "users sign up for
> digestified". How do they do that and receive them without the digest being
> defined in the congiguration. It seems contradictory to me. Thanks once
> again.
>
> Users sign up for digestified rather than immediate delivery with 'SET
> listnameDIGests', while indexes are selected with 'SET listname INDex'.
> These two options are alternatives to MAIL and NOMAIL. When switching around
> between these delivery options, users will observe the following behavior
> (digests will be assumed to be daily for the sake of clarity):
>

Some LISTSERV keywords have default values; digest= is one of them.

	The list owner controls the availability and frequency of digests
	through the "Digest=" list header keyword, which defaults to "Digest=
	No" for lists without an archive and "Digest= Yes,Same,Daily" for
	archived lists.

Apparently, this list is archived, so it defaults to daily digests.

--
Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator
OIT Messaging Services Team
University of Notre Dame

ATOM RSS1 RSS2