It's late and I've had to be bright and intelligent in a couple of meetings
this PM so pardon any faux pas.....
 
I sent out 1 message to the IBM-MAIN list at UA1VM.  I got back a listserv
note from RUTVM1 at RUTGERS saying that I'd sent two identical notes.
I'm assuming that it got routed to NetNews thru a gateway and then another
gateway sent it back to BitNet or some such situation.....
 
Anyway, is this normal behaviour and did my note really get mailed to all
the IBM-MAIN peers?  I know that UA1VM sent it out because it's in the log
and I got a confirmation message.  I am assuming that the original got sent
an only the psuedo-duplicates are being purged.
 
Just in case this is indicative of a problem, here is the header from the
listserv note I got.  (I know, I should figure all this out for myself as
a learning exercise but to quote Monty Python "My Brain Hurts".....)
 
Greg Monroe  <[log in to unmask]>
Duke's Fuqua School of Business
Durham, NC  27708-0114
 
----------------------Returned note info----------------------------
>Received: from RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU by DUKEFSB.BITNET (Mailer R2.08 PTF008) with
> BSMTP id 5210; Thu, 24 Jun 93 14:07:31 EST
>Received: from RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@RUTVM1) by
> RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2477; Thu,
> 24 Jun 1993 14:05:14 -0400
>Date:         Thu, 24 Jun 1993 14:05:14 -0400
>From:         BITNET list server at RUTVM1 (1.7f) <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      Rejected posting to IBM-MAIN@RUTVM1
>To:           [log in to unmask]
>
>Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been
>already sent to the IBM-MAIN list. ..... <omitted std msg> ....
>
>------------------------ Rejected message (113 lines) -------------------------
>Return-Path: <@RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU,@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU:[log in to unmask]
>N.EDU>
>Received: from VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@AKRONVM) by RUTVM1.RUTGERS.
>DU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2475; Thu, 24 Jun 1993 14:05:11 -0400
>Received: from VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@AKRONVM) by VM1.CC.UAKRON
>EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8232; Thu, 24 Jun 1993 14:00:48 -0400
>Received: from AKRONVM.BITNET by VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.7f) with
>          NJE id 6320 for [log in to unmask]; Thu,
>          24 Jun 1993 14:00:45 -0400
>Return-Path: <@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU,@UA1VM.UA.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from UA1VM.UA.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@UA1VM) by VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU
>          (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8230; Thu, 24 Jun 1993 14:00:44 -040
>Received: from UA1VM.UA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UA1VM) by UA1VM.UA.EDU (LMail
>          V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0138; Thu, 24 Jun 1993 13:00:51 -0500
>Received: from UA1VM.BITNET by UA1VM.UA.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.7f) with NJE id
>          8484 for [log in to unmask]; Thu, 24 Jun 1993 13:00:49 -0500
>Return-Path: <@UA1VM.UA.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from DUKEFSB.BITNET (NJE origin MAILER@DUKEFSB) by UA1VM.UA.EDU
>          (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0136; Thu, 24 Jun 1993 13:00:48 -050
>Received: from DUKEFSB (MONROE) by DUKEFSB.BITNET (Mailer R2.08 PTF008) with
>          BSMTP id 5176; Thu, 24 Jun 93 13:59:13 EST
>Message-ID:   <[log in to unmask]>
>Newsgroups:   bit.listserv.ibm-main
>Date:         Thu, 24 Jun 1993 10:21:03 EST
>Reply-To:     IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender:       IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
>From:         Greg Monroe <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      Re: Temp Disk Hogs
>X-LSVRepTo:
>X-LSVopts: NOACK Org=IBM-MAIN@UA1VM
>X-LSVvia: IBM-MAIN@UA1VM IBM-MAIN@AKRONVM
>X-LSVTag: Return-Path: <@UA1VM.UA.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
>X-LSVTag: Date: Thu, 24 Jun 93 10:21:03 EST
>X-LSVTag: From: Greg Monroe <MONROE@DUKEFSB>
>X-LSVTag: Subject: Re: Temp Disk Hogs
>X-LSVTag: To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@UA1VM>
>X-LSVTag: Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>To:           $PEER$ <[log in to unmask]>
>
>..... <omitted my drivel to protect the unthinking> .....