As list owner, I lsvput listname logxxxx, but got back from LISTSERV:
 
File "listname LOG9501" is unknown to LISTSERV, PUT request rejected.
 
"listname" of course was substituted with the real name; and there
was no pre-existing LOG9501 on listname. This is LISTSERV 1.8a
 
So, does Eric's solution (far below) imply that:
 
1) I shouldn't use LSVPUT (as list owner), or
 
2) that I must be LISTSERV administrator and PUT the LOGs, or
 
3) that the list _must_ be name xxxx-L (i.e, _with_ a "-L"), and _cannot_
   be named something like xxxxxx (i.e, without the "-L" suffix, which
   is the case for the list in question)?
 
If 1 or 3, then how do I do it?
Peter
- - - - - - -
>From: Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      Re: Adding LOGxxxx files
 
>You can just PUT the logs,  *without* defining them in the FILELIST. They
>will be  recognized automatically as  logs, provided you use  the correct
>naming convention (xxxx-L LOGyymm).