"Geert K. Marien" <GKMCU@CUNYVM>
Mon, 3 Apr 89 11:23:37 EDT
|
On Mon, 3 Apr 89 12:00:50 GMT Eric Thomas said:
>
> ... The complaints come from sites which
>have a good number of large local lists, sometimes with as much as 1000
>subscribers on them, and who've got to justify every second of CPU time
>spent on network (ie non-local) services. I don't really know what to do
>there. They could be allowed to disable netwide functions, but then what
>happens if they do have a few non-local lists (that is usually the case,
>even if most lists are local)? What if a local user does a SIGNOFF with
>the NETWIDE option and doesn't get signed off these lists because the
>function is disabled?
Why not have a Local-Only header. Only Local Postmasters may affect these
lists. Other commands touch (search/modify) only Local-Only = No lists.
A local area may be defined in the SYSVARS file(s) and then it may be used
as a service-area parm as well.
/Geert
** The views above are my own and may not be those of my employer. **
** They should be taken as my own and not as those of anyone else. **
|
|
|