LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
"Roy L. Lehmann" <[log in to unmask]>
Sun, 20 Feb 1994 15:24:35 EST
text/plain (83 lines)
I received the following reject on a post to VM-UTIL.
Who is the proper person to notify of the error?
 
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been
already sent to the  VM-UTIL list. That is, a message  with identical body (but
possibly different headers) has been posted to the list recently, either by you
or by  someone else. If you  have a good reason  to resend this message  to the
list (for instance because half of the outbound spool files were lost in a disk
crash at  some intermediate node),  please alter the  message text in  some way
before resending  it. Note that  altering the  "Subject:" line or  adding blank
lines at the top or bottom of the message is not sufficient; you should instead
add a line  at the top explaining  why you are re-sending the  message, for the
benefit of the list membership.
 
------------------------- Rejected message (66 lines) -------------------------
Return-Path: <@PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU,
             @UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@UTARLVM1) by
          PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2244; Fri,
          18 Feb 1994 15:03:51 -0800
Received: from UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UTARLVM1) by
          UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 7077; Fri,
          18 Feb 1994 16:52:55 -0600
Received: from UTARLVM1.BITNET by UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.7f) with
          NJE id 9741 for [log in to unmask]; Fri,
          18 Feb 1994 16:52:49 -0600
Return-Path: <@UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU,
             @UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@UBVM) by UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU
          (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 6774; Fri, 18 Feb 1994 16:49:46 -0600
Received: from UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UBVM) by
          UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4160; Fri,
          18 Feb 1994 11:17:24 -0500
Received: from UBVM.BITNET by UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8a) with
          NJE id 4498 for [log in to unmask]; Fri,
          18 Feb 1994 11:17:22 -0500
Return-Path: <@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU,@NKI.BITNET:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from NKI.BITNET (NJE origin MAILER@NKI) by UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (LMail
          V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3898; Fri, 18 Feb 1994 11:15:09 -0500
Received: from NKI (NJE origin ROY@NKI) by NKI.BITNET (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with
          BSMTP id 7407; Fri, 18 Feb 1994 11:15:11 -0500
X-Acknowledge-To: <ROY@NKI>
Message-ID:   <940218.105804.EST.ROY@NKI>
Newsgroups:   bit.listserv.vm-util
Date:         Fri, 18 Feb 1994 10:58:04 EST
Reply-To:     VM Utilities Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       VM Utilities Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Roy L. Lehmann" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      CA/UNICENTER DYNAM/B
X-LSVRepTo:
X-LSVopts: MSGACK Org=VM-UTIL@UBVM
X-LSVvia: VM-UTIL@UBVM VM-UTIL@UTARLVM1
X-LSVTo: vmsys-l@uga VM Systems Progammer's list
X-LSVTo: OPERS-L@AKRONVM Mainframe operations discussion list
X-LSVTag: Return-Path: <@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU,@NKI.BITNET:[log in to unmask]>
X-LSVTag: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 10:58:04 EST
X-LSVTag: From: "Roy L. Lehmann" <ROY@NKI>
X-LSVTag: Subject: CA/UNICENTER DYNAM/B
X-LSVTag: To: VM Systems Progammer's list <vmsys-l@uga>,
          VM Utilities Discussion List <VM-UTIL@UBVM>,
          Mainframe operations discussion list <OPERS-L@AKRONVM>
X-LSVTag: Message-Id: <940218.105804.EST.ROY@NKI>
X-LSVTag: X-Acknowledge-To: <ROY@NKI>
To:           $PEER$ <[log in to unmask]>
 
We have a chance to purchase (at a discount) the CA/UNICENTER package.
We are especially interested in DYNAM/B.  We will be using to to replace
SYNCSORT's SYBACK.  We run VM/ESA 1.1.0 (370 FEATURE) and use SFS for all
user files.  We are interested in hearing from others who use DYNAM/B.
How easy was it to install?  How well does it support SFS file level backups
and restores?  How well does it support tape management systems?  Are there
any other problems we should be aware of?  For all operators:  What is your
opnion of this product?  Any comments on the other elements of CA/UNICENTER
will also be welcomed.  Please restrict your responses to a discussion of
the programs themselves.  We are well well aware of the problems with
Computer Associates.
 
 
Roy L. Lehmann - Systems Programmer
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
[log in to unmask] -- VOICE MAIL: 914 365-2000 ext 1768

ATOM RSS1 RSS2