On 26 Aug 99, at 13:29, Pete Weiss wrote:

>It isn't necessarily a needless feature per se, BUT in the scheme of the
>universe of LISTSERV-features, it may be of much lower priority that some
>would then translate to the same value as 'needless.'   Therefore, a

A related discussion of setting a Primary-owner has been discussed here
before. Specifically, SJU has had list piracy issues but accepts that this
may not be a practical use of LSoft's resources.  A hypothetical factor
might be the, uh, future utility of a feature.  My SWAG is that an increasing
percentage of lists are going to be based on home PC's where the primary
owner is also the (24 x 7cable connected) PC's  Listmaster.  We're
hopeful that a lot of these issues will just go away in this "One Ranger
for one riotER" scenario.
                                               -Kary