|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:49:25 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
<15AFE52BC671D311950200008348EB7901560EBC@TRB-MS1> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
At 08:16 10/12/2000 Thursday, Langum, Michael J. wrote:
>We changed the "Send= Open" to "Send= Private". I then wanted to test the
>result, so I (a non-subscriber) sent a test message to the list. I received
>a "Your message has been distributed..." reply from the list.
>
>Then I got several "out of office" messages from subscribers.
>
>The header has the following lines:
>Reply-to= List
>Send= Private
>Sender= List
>
>Any suggestions???
It is possible that this is a "timing" issue -- updating of the list
definition headers may have occurred AFTER the software processed a (not
the) message from you.
Or it is possible that "you" are a subscriber and thus the change of
definition was not effective in this test?
The REPLY-TO= has nothing to do with any of the symptons enumerated
The "out of office" messages are a result of 'broken" subscriber systems
e.g., vacation messages sent as the result of bulk mail (e.g.,
LISTSERV-based) is specious.
Pete Weiss @ Penn State
|
|
|