LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (24 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Marty Hoag <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Nov 1993 08:13:09 CST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Wed, 3 Nov 1993 17:55:25 EST from <SPONSELL@AKRONVM>
Organization:
North Dakota Higher Education Computer Network
Reply-To:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
On Wed, 3 Nov 1993 17:55:25 EST Gary Sponseller said:
>We run nearly all lists here with X-Tags= Yes.
>
>One subscriber (out of 400+) from one of these lists is occasionally
>getting duplicate postings.  The claim is that X-Tags= Yes is possibly
>the problem.  I have no idea if this is true or not, but I am doubtful.
>My questions are:
>
>Has anyone else seen a duplicate posting problem that was solved solely
>by changing X-Tags?  If not, how would you trace this problem from this
 
   Yes.  As I recall UCLA mail uses the X-tags that LISTSERV uses for internal
use.  The duplication happens, as I recall, when there are other recipients
besides the list in the original mail.  Listserv changes these to X-To: and
then when UCLA mail gets them bad things happen.  I don't know if there is
a fix for this or not.  This was a year or so ago.  But to avoid problems
I've standardized on X-Tags= Comment .  I don't know of any systems using
comments for routing.  ;-)
 
     Marty
 
>Listserv site to that end site?  Personal mail sent to the remote user
>arrives there in single copy...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2