On Fri, 30 Jul 1993 18:43:26 CDT Marty Hoag <[log in to unmask]>
said:
> The key thing is that the destination of the 2nd message may be
>different from the first. I think that was what the owner wanted which
>prompted us to use lsvimail. The "survey" message is sent directly to
>the person who requested to be added while the ADDREQ1 (or whatever) is
>sent to the owner (with cc: to requester as I recall).
No problem: the target's address is available to the exit, whereas you
can use listname-request for the list owner's address or, if you really
need the actual address, extract it from the list header via LSVKEYWD.
Eric