On Fri,  30 Jul  1993 18:43:26  CDT Marty  Hoag <[log in to unmask]>
said:
 
>   The  key thing  is that  the destination  of the  2nd message  may be
>different from the  first. I think that was what  the owner wanted which
>prompted us  to use lsvimail. The  "survey" message is sent  directly to
>the person who requested to be  added while the ADDREQ1 (or whatever) is
>sent to the owner (with cc: to requester as I recall).
 
No problem:  the target's address is  available to the exit,  whereas you
can use listname-request  for the list owner's address or,  if you really
need the actual address, extract it from the list header via LSVKEYWD.
 
  Eric