Thu, 6 Feb 1992 22:19:27 EST
|
Some people suggested that I do not bother to peer my INDIA-D list again since
the mail-via=dist2 option is efficient enough for lists that maintain lots of
non-local subscribers. I have been using mail-via=dist2 for a while so I have
decided not to peer my list again. I am writing now because this topic raised
an interesting question.
Since mail-via=dist2 is enough to handle the load from lists with lots of
non-local subscribers, isn't the concept of peering now obsolete? The list I
asked about, INDIA-D, is already peered here and I wanted to break it off once
again. Does it make sense to go the other way and take the list off my
listserv and give it back to the person's listserv where it originates? Does
it make sense to unpeer all lists? Sorry if this question seems stupid, but I
had to ask anyway.
Stan Horwitz
Listserv Postmaster
Temple University
Acknowledge to: OASIS@TEMPLEVM (or VM.TEMPLE.EDU)
|
|
|