|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:46:03 -0400 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Sender: |
|
On: Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 07:57:59AM -0400,Pete Weiss Wrote:
} It almost always "helps" to have the subscribe forward to you a set of
} duplicates with *all* RECEIVED line headers.
}
} Also ask your subscriber if they have been subscribed under any other
} surname or from another instituition/ISP.
}
} Looks for any "group" subscribers. We've had folks individually and
} group-subscribed. We highly discourage group-subscribes for that very
} reason.
Besides this, set the subscriber to NOMAIL on the address you know
about, then see if they get one less or none.
As Pete suggests, a FULL set of headers can be very useful. If one
mail went from Listserv to B to C to subscriber, and another went from
Listserv to X to Y to subscriber, check for subs from X, Y, A & B.
--
Rich Greenberg Work: Rich.Greenberg atsign worldspan.com + 1 770 563 6656
N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA Play: richgr atsign panix.com + 1 770 321 6507
Eastern time zone. I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val(Chinook,CGC,TT), Red & Shasta(Husky,(RIP)) Owner:Chinook-L
Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. www.panix.com/~richgr/ Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
|
|
|