At 09:00 AM 8/27/96 EDT, you wrote:
>The info that you provided does not indicate a "problem"
>per se.
>
>Please submit all of the headers that you received. You
>can elide the body of the message if appropriate.
>
>/Pete Weiss at Penn State
Here is total header - sorry for admission:
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:30 -0400
From: "L-Soft list server at MACON TECH (1.8b)"
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: VPI: error report from GWINNETT.TEC.GA.US
To: [log in to unmask], Jim Watkins <[log in to unmask]>
X-Lsv-Listid: None
The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list VPI
because it was sent to the reserved 'owner-vpi' mailbox.
------------------------------ Message in error -------------------------------
Received: by gti0.gwinnett.tec.ga.us with Microsoft Exchange (IMC 4.0.837.3)
id <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:12 -0000
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
From: System Administrator <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Undeliverable: Re: technology fee
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:12 -0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.837.3
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
To: Multiple recipients of list VPI
Subject: Re: technology fee
Sent: 8/27/96 8:09:12 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
[log in to unmask] on 8/27/96 8:09:12 AM
Recipient Not Found
[MSEXCH:IMC:DTAE:Gwinnett Technical Institute:GTI0]
JimW