Well we have text; html and aol version is there a better way to do it?
Sorry I'm new in the universe of email. :P

-----Original Message-----
From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Valdis Kletnieks
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Bounced Email

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:25:23 -0400, Bruno Robichaud said:

> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="123456789123456789abcd"
> 
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
>     ' + @BodyTEXT + '
> 
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
>     ' + @BodyHTML + ' 
> 
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
>     ' + @BodyAOL + ' 

Gaak.  Two *different* text/html bodyparts in a multipart/alternative?

Pray tell, how does the MUA choose which one to display?  And is there a
problem with using *one* text/html that's actually standards-compliant
rather than standards-complacent? ;)