 
|
| Sender: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
"Richard A. Schafer" <SCHAFER@RICE> |
| Date: |
Thu, 09 Apr 87 11:34:53 CDT |
| In-Reply-To: |
Message of Thu, 09 Apr 87 08:14:46 MET from <U001212@HEARN> |
| Reply-To: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
>michael,
>am i dreaming or do i have really a better solution for your problem
>(ONE release level for ALL listservs) ?
>- LISTSERV should be updated on the same as b.pasch does it for
> NETSERV. this means that we all don't have to care about any updates!
>eric: what do you feel about it ?
> -ulrich-
If this means having LISTSERV automatically updated from the network,
I am unalterably opposed to it. I've seen enough problems with
newly released versions that I will *never* update LISTSERV (or anything
else, for that matter) immediately. Now that doesn't mean I wait 6
months before installing it, but it means that I have procedures that
I follow before I install the new version, which include letting it
age until the just-after-release bug reports come in.
Richard
|
|
|
