?Most lists here are
Send= Private
But some do require the intervention of an editor at least some times. And the Editor lists are being hammered; the owners need some relief. We can block all or most of the notifications that are a consequence.
--Joe
________________________________
From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor
If your real concern is non-members, and you would prefer not to moderate members' posts at all, you should probably just use
Send= Private
Then non-member's posts are simply rejected out of hand.
Nathan
From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of F J Kelley
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor
?Thanks Nathan!
If my real concern were just non-members would
Send= Editor,Hold,Confirm,Non-Member
Send= (listname)
Would this allow members to post, but block non-members unless approved?
________________________________
From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor
Add ",Non-Member" to the Editor= setting. E.g.,
Send= Editor,Hold,Confirm,Non-Member
Makes unsubscribed senders confirm their own messages before they are forwarded to the editor. Note that you MUST also specify ",Confirm" with ",Non-Member" if it is not already specified. That requires Editors to confirm their own postings as well, which is a feature every moderated list should utilize (IMHO).
http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/16.0/listkeyw.html#kSend
Nathan
From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Larry Finch
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor
We implemented spam filters in postfix, which we could do because we control the Linux server in addition to listserv.
Best regards
Larry
Hmssurprise.org<http://Hmssurprise.org>
--
Larry Finch
Reach Me: +1.609.379.2756
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:30 AM, F J Kelley <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
?Hi,
We have seen a huge surge in spam directed to lists that are configured as
Send= Editor ...
The editors can reject it, but it is becoming a flood. How are others dealing with this?
--Joe
________________________________
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
________________________________
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
________________________________
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
________________________________
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
________________________________
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
|