|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 1997 17:00:40 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Reply-To: |
|
>Roger Burns wrote:
>Can this be taken off of LSTSRV-L? It doesn't apply to any of us.
Almost, but not quite. I'm sorry to say there are at least three of us
on lstsrv-l with this dreaded disease (CFS or CFIDS). I remember the
uproar on cfs-l, but I didn't follow it closely enough to have a real
opinion on it. I think Mary was asking for a little objective support
here. I don't know who's right and who's wrong, but I'd think there
would be room for letting bygones be bygones. (Roger?)
Sorry for the diversion. I realize this has little to do with the
purpose of lstsrv-l.
Laura
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Laura Toms, Postmaster/UNIX System Administrator
OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Dublin, Ohio
1-800-848-5878, x5016
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|