>Roger Burns wrote:

>Can this be taken off of LSTSRV-L?  It doesn't apply to any of us.

Almost, but not quite.  I'm sorry to say there are at least three of us
on lstsrv-l with this dreaded disease (CFS or CFIDS).  I remember the
uproar on cfs-l, but I didn't follow it closely enough to have a real
opinion on it.  I think Mary was asking for a little objective support
here.  I don't know who's right and who's wrong, but I'd think there
would be room for letting bygones be bygones.  (Roger?)

Sorry for the diversion.  I realize this has little to do with the
purpose of lstsrv-l.

Laura
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Laura Toms, Postmaster/UNIX System Administrator
OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Dublin, Ohio
1-800-848-5878, x5016
[log in to unmask]