LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (19 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:14:25 -0600
Reply-To:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
James Morrill <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<OF5494ED8E.03B77337-ON852576B2.00601292-852576B2.00603546@LocalDomain>
Organization:
CNS
Comments:
I don't see that it matters if it's an employee or not.  If someone is
using your service and won't follow your policies it's a personnel
issue, not a technical issue.

On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Paul  wrote on 01/21/2010 11:21:20 AM:
> > As I noted previously, locking the list will prevent inadvertent changes;
> > intentional changes in violation of a stated organizational policy need
> to be
> > treated as personnel issues, not technical problems.
>
> That's great when the violator is an employee of the organization.  That's
> not always the case.

--
 James Morrill  office: HL 11, 785-532-4909   www-personal.ksu.edu/~james

     A fine is a tax for doing wrong.  A tax is a fine for doing well.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2