LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
LISTSERV site administrators' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:02:37 -0500
Reply-To:
LISTSERV site administrators' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Subject:
From:
Stan Horwitz <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
In-Reply-To:
<001c01c405ec$3e4b27b0$152aa8c0@solaria>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, A. ömer Kęker wrote:

>No actually someone complaining about an ip number that listserv runs on
>saying that it is spamming hence getting everything running on that IP
>to be rejected.
>
>The process at spamcop.net seems to be flawed in the sense that I can
>simply complain about some IP and with a few forged headers get someone
>blacklisted so easily!
>
>I am sure that spamcop people mean well and we are currently in
>communcation to resolve the issue but it just does not seem right or
>responsible by the mentioned black list. It is taking me longer to clean
>this issue up then it took the politicaly oriented person to get me into
>the list!
>
>Any suggestions on this would be greatly appreciated.

My understanding is that spamcop runs a test for an open relay before
it adds any IP addresses to its blacklist. Are you saying my understanding
is incorrect?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2