 
|
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:49:39 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Organization: |
University of Notre Dame |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
On 1/26/2008 12:00 AM, Ben Parker wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:20:51 -0500, Paul Russell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> This should not be necessary. ... What secret incantation did
>> I forget to recite?
>
> It is not necessary, so something was missed. You said you didn't add the PM
> address as Owner=. But did you put another (non-PM) address there or did you
> leave no Owner= address? The latter would be a undefined error condition, who
> knows what would happen.
>
Yes, there was a non-PM owner specified in the original list configuration.
I used the web interface to create the list. I have never tried to create a
list without an owner= statement, but I would expect LISTSERV to reject the
PUT command, whether it is submitted by email or via the web.
--
Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator
OIT Messaging Services Team
University of Notre Dame
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
