Fri, 16 Jan 1998 09:15:40 -0500
|
When I click REPLY-TO-SENDER and not REPLY-TO-ALL, it only sends the
response to the person. In this case I replied to your message by
clicking REPLY-TO-SENDER and it addressed it to you; I then added the
list address manually.
I think that's probably by design for many lists, but in our case we
would like as much communication to take place on the list as possible
-- so it can be captured and be available on the web-site search
engine. That's why I have the SENDER= keyword. I thought that be
making the sending the list (which it's supposed to be anyway), then
the reply would default to the list, and reply-to-all would then pick
up the other recipients.
To do this I think it would have to look like this:
FROM: list-address
BCC: my-address
TO: actual-senders-address
which is not the way messages are delivered.
Mike
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Changing the order of the Recipients for distributed
Author: Adam Bailey <[log in to unmask]> at Internet
Date: 1/15/98 5:18 PM
On 1/15/98 3:17 PM, Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote...
> Hmmm. So when you recieve my initial message and hit reply, if you
> REPLY-TO-SENDER only does that go to me or to the list?
The Reply goes to the list, as it's supposed to, so I guess it's not your
mailer. However, I share Mr. Weiss' confusion. Your list appears to be
configured correctly, as far as I can tell. My only question is: why are
you using the Sender Keyword? Are you giving it a value other than the
list you're talking about? Otherwise, Sender defaults to the list, and
it's not necessary to use that Keyword unless you want your Sender to be
something else.
--
Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-| "Do not take life too seriously;
[log in to unmask] | you will never get out of it alive."
[log in to unmask] | - Elbert Hubbard
Finger for PGP | http://www.tezcat.com/~adamb
|
|
|