|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 May 2001 16:54:07 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Comments: |
|
On Wed, 16 May 2001 09:43:02 PDT, John Morrison <[log in to unmask]> said:
> We must have the ability to subscribe someone to more than 50 lists in an hour. They should also need to confirm their request,
> incase our utility was used for a malicious intent. I do understand being inundated with 50+ confirmation requests is malicious
> itself.
You must have it, or you just *think* you must have it?
Now tell me - are these lists *SO* high traffic that if you subscribe the
user to 25 lists now, and then wait an hour and subscribe him to the next
25 lists, that he will miss *THAT* much traffic from the second set of 25?
Consider that if the user had decided to subscribe an hour later, he would
have missed that mail *anyhow*. And they've already missed all the OTHER
postings to the list so far that day.. and yesterday's postings.. and....
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
|
|
|