LISTSERV - LSTOWN-L Archives - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM

LSTOWN-L Archives

LSTOWN-L

LISTSERV Archives

LSTOWN-L Home

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives

Options:

Subject	From	Date
Re: Change request: Language=NoHTML should cause rejection of single part HTML messages	Liz Marr	Thu, 31 May 2001 17:26:03 -0700
oceanfree.net	Sherry Beauchamp	Thu, 31 May 2001 10:53:03 -0700
Re: SENDER CONFIRM OPTION?	Ben Parker	Thu, 31 May 2001 10:00:51 -0600
Re: SENDER CONFIRM OPTION?	Tom Rawson	Thu, 31 May 2001 11:57:50 -0400
Re: SENDER CONFIRM OPTION?	Jacob Haller	Thu, 31 May 2001 11:56:09 -0400
Re: subscription= by owner	Michael McNeil	Thu, 31 May 2001 11:41:33 -0400
SENDER CONFIRM OPTION?	Evans, Geoffrey	Thu, 31 May 2001 11:27:31 -0400
Re: HTML posts	Clark Pickett	Thu, 31 May 2001 06:27:16 -0700
Re: HTML posts	Russ Hunt	Thu, 31 May 2001 11:38:41 AST4ADT
Re: subscription= by owner	Don Wiss	Wed, 30 May 2001 19:37:40 -0400
Change request: Language=NoHTML should cause rejection of single part HTML messages	Paul Russell	Wed, 30 May 2001 18:02:41 -0500
Re: HTML posts	Liz Marr	Wed, 30 May 2001 12:04:05 -0700
served out user.	BRIAN MC NAMARA	Wed, 30 May 2001 11:09:20 -0500
Re: served out user.	Jacob Haller	Wed, 30 May 2001 11:30:47 -0400
Re: Digest Question	Pete Weiss	Wed, 30 May 2001 10:54:20 -0400
Digest Question	Louis J Wiesemann	Wed, 30 May 2001 10:20:37 -0400
Re: subscription= by owner AND subscription=open,confirm?	Klaus Marion	Wed, 30 May 2001 09:38:25 +0200
Language = NOHTML vs. almost no HTML (was: HTML posts...)	Michael S. Johnson	Tue, 29 May 2001 16:36:01 -0700
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Jane-Kerin Moffat	Tue, 29 May 2001 18:51:04 -0400
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Good, Donald	Tue, 29 May 2001 16:47:19 -0500
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Ben Parker	Tue, 29 May 2001 15:23:54 -0600
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Pete Weiss	Tue, 29 May 2001 16:23:26 -0400
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Good, Donald	Tue, 29 May 2001 15:11:12 -0500
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Good, Donald	Tue, 29 May 2001 15:07:54 -0500
Re: subscription= by owner AND subscription=open,confirm?	Keller, Richard (CIT)	Tue, 29 May 2001 12:25:09 -0400
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Linda Shives	Tue, 29 May 2001 11:28:41 -0400
subscription= by owner AND subscription=open,confirm?	Klaus Marion	Tue, 29 May 2001 17:25:36 +0200
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for h acker	Linda Shives	Tue, 29 May 2001 10:45:07 -0400
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for h acker	Pete Weiss	Tue, 29 May 2001 09:55:45 -0400
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for h acker	Stan Horwitz	Tue, 29 May 2001 09:47:58 -0400
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for h acker	Laurijssens, F (Frank)	Tue, 29 May 2001 14:41:31 +0200
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for h acke	Russ Hunt	Tue, 29 May 2001 12:03:08 AST4ADT
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hacker	Russ Hunt	Tue, 29 May 2001 09:00:32 AST4ADT
Re: paid for work	Michael Shannon	Tue, 29 May 2001 15:20:57 +1000
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Jim Walker	Mon, 28 May 2001 14:40:31 -0400
Re: invisible test?	Jane-Kerin Moffat	Mon, 28 May 2001 14:33:44 -0400
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Scout	Mon, 28 May 2001 12:38:24 -0500
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Jim Walker	Mon, 28 May 2001 11:35:54 -0400
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Jim Walker	Mon, 28 May 2001 11:35:54 -0400
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Pete Weiss	Mon, 28 May 2001 10:38:23 -0400
Re: HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Scout	Mon, 28 May 2001 09:37:08 -0500
Re: paid for work	Anita Cohen-Williams	Mon, 28 May 2001 01:28:42 -0700
Re: paid for work	Mary Siegel	Mon, 28 May 2001 00:11:35 -0500
Re: invisible test?	Roger Fajman	Mon, 28 May 2001 00:21:08 -0400
Re: invisible test?	Jane-Kerin Moffat	Sun, 27 May 2001 22:19:30 -0400
Re: ÝLSTOWN-L¨ invisible test?	Ben Parker	Sun, 27 May 2001 19:44:47 -0600
Re: paid for work	Roger Fajman	Sun, 27 May 2001 20:44:09 -0400
Re: invisible test?	Roger Fajman	Sun, 27 May 2001 20:38:29 -0400
invisible test?	Jane-Kerin Moffat	Sun, 27 May 2001 20:08:18 -0400
Re: paid for work	Mary Siegel	Sun, 27 May 2001 18:15:31 -0500
Re: Moderation	Mary Siegel	Sun, 27 May 2001 17:42:59 -0500
Re: Moderation	Mary Siegel	Sun, 27 May 2001 16:22:08 -0500
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Mary Siegel	Sun, 27 May 2001 15:48:30 -0500
HTML posts make LISTSERV lists a soft target for hackers	Jim Walker	Sun, 27 May 2001 13:28:59 -0400
Fool listowners (was Re: gettng rid of attachments)	Winship	Sun, 27 May 2001 11:58:43 -0500
Re: Moderation	Jeff Parke	Sun, 27 May 2001 09:49:56 -0700
LISTSERV Problems and Errors	Jim Walker	Sun, 27 May 2001 11:32:18 -0400
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Tesa Marcon	Mon, 28 May 2001 01:11:51 +1000
Moderation	Tom Rawson	Sun, 27 May 2001 10:38:55 -0400
Thank you!	Lydia Fish	Sun, 27 May 2001 09:12:29 EDT
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Karen Reznek	Sun, 27 May 2001 07:54:29 -0400
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Russ Hunt	Sun, 27 May 2001 09:19:09 AST4ADT
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Mary Siegel	Sun, 27 May 2001 03:44:24 -0500
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Winship	Sun, 27 May 2001 03:21:05 -0500
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Mary Siegel	Sun, 27 May 2001 02:36:06 -0500
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Winship	Sun, 27 May 2001 01:06:37 -0500
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Liz Marr	Sat, 26 May 2001 20:01:30 -0700
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Mary Siegel	Sat, 26 May 2001 20:56:59 -0500
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Tesa Marcon	Sun, 27 May 2001 10:31:53 +1000
Re: All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Mary Siegel	Sat, 26 May 2001 14:58:47 -0500
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Pete Weiss	Sat, 26 May 2001 08:15:47 -0400
All REViews not being received by all moderators.	Tesa Marcon	Sat, 26 May 2001 12:46:07 +1000
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Winship	Fri, 25 May 2001 18:44:28 -0500
Re: gettng rid of attachments	Michael L. Wyland	Fri, 25 May 2001 17:00:46 -0500
gettng rid of attachments	Lydia Fish	Fri, 25 May 2001 16:29:07 EDT
Re: OOOFs	Mp Welch	Fri, 25 May 2001 08:10:28 -0500
Re: OOOFs	William Hudson	Fri, 25 May 2001 12:53:49 +0100
Re: OOOFs	Russ Hunt	Fri, 25 May 2001 08:33:08 AST4ADT
Re: Recycling messages to this list	Mary Siegel	Thu, 24 May 2001 22:54:52 -0500
OOOFs	Winship	Thu, 24 May 2001 21:37:48 -0500
Re: [LIST-OWNERS] More missing mail	Winship	Thu, 24 May 2001 21:31:06 -0500
Ooops - wrong list	Liz Marr	Thu, 24 May 2001 18:03:25 -0700
Re: [LIST-OWNERS] More missing mail	Liz Marr	Thu, 24 May 2001 18:00:45 -0700
Re: Recycling messages to this list	Ben Parker	Thu, 24 May 2001 18:50:11 -0600
Recycling messages to this list	Liz Marr	Thu, 24 May 2001 17:32:17 -0700
Re: Repeating subscription probe problem on a list set to passive probe	Ben Parker	Thu, 24 May 2001 18:13:40 -0600
Re: Repeating subscription probe problem on a list set to passive probe	Michael Hensley	Thu, 24 May 2001 19:54:45 -0400
Re: Plain-text edition of Owners Manual Appendix B	Ben Parker	Thu, 24 May 2001 15:48:50 -0600
Plain-text edition of Owners Manual Appendix B	Jane-Kerin Moffat	Thu, 24 May 2001 15:48:20 -0400
Re: Repeating subscription probe problem on a list set to passive probe	Ben Parker	Thu, 24 May 2001 13:43:04 -0600
Repeating subscription probe problem on a list set to passive probe	Michael Hensley	Thu, 24 May 2001 11:53:35 -0400
Re: Frequent delivery error reports	Michael Shannon	Thu, 24 May 2001 14:41:05 +1000
Re: Frequent delivery error reports	Stan Horwitz	Wed, 23 May 2001 23:16:32 -0400
Frequent delivery error reports	Good, Donald	Wed, 23 May 2001 17:45:45 -0500
Re: Moderated postings from within a service area	Jacob Haller	Tue, 22 May 2001 23:22:24 -0400
Moderated postings from within a service area	Steve Howie	Tue, 22 May 2001 17:18:55 -0400
A heads up for MSN.COM	Stan Horwitz	Tue, 22 May 2001 15:31:03 -0400
Re: Bad_Attachment template & Manual Appendix B	Jane-Kerin Moffat	Tue, 22 May 2001 10:50:50 -0400
Re: Bad_Attachment template & Manual Appendix B	Ben Parker	Mon, 21 May 2001 21:06:59 -0600
Bad_Attachment template & Manual Appendix B	Jane-Kerin Moffat	Mon, 21 May 2001 18:08:52 -0400
Re: AOL woes	Pete Weiss	Mon, 21 May 2001 12:16:38 -0400
Re: AOL woes	David Wood	Mon, 21 May 2001 16:38:52 +0100
listserv.aol.com	David Wood	Mon, 21 May 2001 12:44:26 +0100
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Michael McNeil	Fri, 18 May 2001 16:41:13 -0700
Template CONFIRM1	John Morrison	Fri, 18 May 2001 15:09:39 -0700
good news -- Eudora 5.1 MIME digests work w/ LISTSERV	Pete Weiss	Thu, 17 May 2001 09:41:46 -0400
Disabling anti-spoofing	John Morrison	Wed, 16 May 2001 15:51:08 -0700
Re: Delivery Error Report	Pete Weiss	Wed, 16 May 2001 14:02:05 -0400
Delivery Error Report	Dan Buettner	Wed, 16 May 2001 12:51:30 -0500
Re: AOL woes	Glenn Darwin	Tue, 15 May 2001 23:55:28 -0400
AOL woes	Liz Marr	Tue, 15 May 2001 20:08:32 -0700
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Chris Patterson	Tue, 15 May 2001 11:09:39 -0400
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Doug Wheeler	Tue, 15 May 2001 11:05:25 -0400
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Winship	Tue, 15 May 2001 09:36:39 -0500
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Doug Wheeler	Tue, 15 May 2001 09:35:08 -0400
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Scout	Mon, 14 May 2001 19:12:28 -0500
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Winship	Mon, 14 May 2001 19:09:05 -0500
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Don Wiss	Mon, 14 May 2001 19:44:47 -0400
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Liz Marr	Mon, 14 May 2001 15:06:11 -0700
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Michael McNeil	Mon, 14 May 2001 06:18:17 -0700
Re: [log in to unmask] Relaying denied ???	Liz Marr	Sun, 13 May 2001 19:59:52 -0700
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Liz Marr	Sun, 13 May 2001 19:57:57 -0700
Re: [log in to unmask] Relaying denied ???	Stan Horwitz	Sun, 13 May 2001 22:12:34 -0400
Re: [log in to unmask] Relaying denied ???	Tom Rawson	Sun, 13 May 2001 21:49:42 -0400
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Scout	Sun, 13 May 2001 20:23:28 -0500
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Michael McNeil	Sun, 13 May 2001 16:45:52 -0700
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Scout	Sun, 13 May 2001 18:15:43 -0500
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Michael McNeil	Sun, 13 May 2001 15:44:36 -0700
Re: [log in to unmask] Relaying denied ???	Michael McNeil	Sun, 13 May 2001 15:12:27 -0700
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Don Wiss	Sun, 13 May 2001 18:08:25 -0400
[log in to unmask] Relaying denied ???	Peter Rauch	Sun, 13 May 2001 01:03:52 -0700
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Don Wiss	Sat, 12 May 2001 18:09:41 -0400
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Michael McNeil	Sat, 12 May 2001 13:31:38 -0700
Re: Who inherits e-mail? (fwd)	Michael McNeil	Sat, 12 May 2001 13:26:42 -0700
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Scout	Sat, 12 May 2001 12:56:50 -0500
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Dr. Mom	Sat, 12 May 2001 08:55:17 -0400
Re: Take a look to the attachment	Gilles Frydman	Sat, 12 May 2001 08:46:38 -0400
Take a look to the attachment	Paul Karagianis	Sat, 12 May 2001 08:11:40 -0400
Re: Who inherits e-mail? (fwd)	Winship	Fri, 11 May 2001 21:06:15 -0500
how do you use the lcmd tool	Rob	Fri, 11 May 2001 13:23:24 -0400
Re: Who inherits e-mail? (fwd)	Michael McNeil	Fri, 11 May 2001 09:51:01 -0700
Re: Who inherits e-mail? (fwd)	Winship	Fri, 11 May 2001 02:54:04 -0500
Re: Who inherits e-mail? (fwd)	Randy Ryan	Thu, 10 May 2001 22:44:41 -0700
Re: Who inherits e-mail? (fwd)	Winship	Thu, 10 May 2001 18:54:04 -0500
Message Header Wanted	Dr. Josef W. Meri	Thu, 10 May 2001 14:47:50 -0700
Who inherits e-mail? (fwd)	Gabe Goldberg	Thu, 10 May 2001 13:26:56 -0400
Re: Update the admin name.	Ben Parker	Wed, 9 May 2001 21:59:55 -0600
Update the admin name.	Glenn Darwin	Wed, 9 May 2001 23:08:56 -0400
Re: Enhancement request: New confirmation procedure for mass commands	Darren Evans-Young	Wed, 9 May 2001 18:00:43 -0500
Enhancement request: New confirmation procedure for mass commands	Paul Russell	Wed, 9 May 2001 17:48:53 -0500
Re: missing messages	Winship	Wed, 9 May 2001 12:27:43 -0500
Re: missing messages	Keller, Richard (CIT)	Wed, 9 May 2001 13:18:46 -0400
missing messages	Nancy Killian	Wed, 9 May 2001 09:53:56 -0700
Redundant Mail Postings	Rowell, Frank	Wed, 9 May 2001 09:16:44 -0400
Re: Report of subscribers receiving 1000+ copies of a posting?	Ben Parker	Tue, 8 May 2001 15:51:00 -0600
Re: Report of subscribers receiving 1000+ copies of a posting?	Dan Robinson	Tue, 8 May 2001 14:05:20 -0400
Report of subscribers receiving 1000+ copies of a posting?	Rowell, Frank	Tue, 8 May 2001 13:36:14 -0400
Foreign Language Character Sets	Billy Grassie	Mon, 7 May 2001 22:28:31 -0400
Re: Confidential Posts	Tom Rawson	Mon, 7 May 2001 16:27:39 -0400
Re: Confidential Posts	rex Sheasby	Mon, 7 May 2001 12:44:06 -0700
Re: Duplicate Message ID's?	Pete Weiss	Mon, 7 May 2001 15:33:55 -0400
Duplicate Message ID's?	John L. Mottl	Mon, 7 May 2001 15:25:45 -0400
Re: Confidential Posts	Kevin Parris	Mon, 7 May 2001 15:19:02 -0400
Re: Confidential Posts	Tom Rawson	Mon, 7 May 2001 13:29:41 -0400
Re: Confidential Posts	Scout	Mon, 7 May 2001 12:28:26 -0500
Re: Confidential Posts	Pete Weiss	Mon, 7 May 2001 13:27:12 -0400
Confidential Posts	Tom Rawson	Mon, 7 May 2001 13:18:01 -0400
Editor-header keyword	William Hudson	Mon, 7 May 2001 17:43:36 +0100
Re: top/bottom banner	Michael Shannon	Mon, 7 May 2001 13:21:56 +1000
Re: 'Filter=' header settings	Ben Parker	Sun, 6 May 2001 20:24:22 -0600
Re: top/bottom banner	Don Wiss	Sun, 6 May 2001 18:21:49 -0400
Re: Editing List Notebook	Ben Parker	Sun, 6 May 2001 12:32:33 -0600
'Filter=' header settings	Steve Wilson	Sun, 6 May 2001 19:30:17 +0100
Editing List Notebook	Billy Grassie	Sun, 6 May 2001 10:20:16 -0400
top/bottom banner	Norma Harwood	Sat, 5 May 2001 13:29:38 EDT
Re: Dual subscription modes to one address	TheGolem	Sat, 5 May 2001 05:40:16 -0400
Re: Dual subscription modes to one address	Michael McNeil	Fri, 4 May 2001 23:00:47 -0700
Re: Dual subscription modes to one address	Winship	Fri, 4 May 2001 23:03:56 -0500
Re: List Owner	Adam Bailey	Fri, 4 May 2001 22:17:36 -0500
Dual subscription modes to one address	Michael McNeil	Fri, 4 May 2001 17:21:57 -0700
Re: List Owner	Michael McNeil	Fri, 4 May 2001 17:02:35 -0700
List Owner	Sue Sefscik	Fri, 4 May 2001 09:40:39 EDT
Re: Transition period...	Ben Parker	Thu, 3 May 2001 19:31:25 -0600
Re: Transition period...	Glenn Darwin	Thu, 3 May 2001 21:25:36 -0400
Re: Transition period...	Ben Parker	Thu, 3 May 2001 19:02:33 -0600
Transition period...	Glenn Darwin	Thu, 3 May 2001 20:43:14 -0400
Re: Listowner Needs to Serve Out HImself	Ben Parker	Thu, 3 May 2001 18:13:29 -0600
Listowner Needs to Serve Out HImself	Bill Harrison	Thu, 3 May 2001 17:03:18 -0500
Re: Mail template location: "Already been distributed..."	Tom Rawson	Wed, 2 May 2001 22:18:30 -0400
Re: Mail template location: "Already been distributed..."	Ben Parker	Wed, 2 May 2001 16:57:42 -0600
Mail template location: "Already been distributed..."	Chris Schoppet	Wed, 2 May 2001 14:44:34 -0400
Overriding Web Page trailer defaults	Keller, Richard (CIT)	Wed, 2 May 2001 10:49:43 -0400
Subscription confirmation should be mandatory, not optional	Paul Russell	Wed, 2 May 2001 08:35:12 -0500
Re: Welcome message	Fred Karp	Tue, 1 May 2001 13:41:11 -0400
Re: Welcome message	Jacob Haller	Tue, 1 May 2001 12:54:41 -0400
Re: Welcome message	TheGolem	Tue, 1 May 2001 12:48:45 -0400
Welcome message	Fred Karp	Tue, 1 May 2001 12:28:34 -0400

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM

LSTOWN-L Archives

LSTOWN-L

Subject

From

Date